Search for: "STATE v FIELD"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 12,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has already issued one ruling in Apple's favor against Google's Motorola (reversing and remanding an ITC ruling, which Google just asked it to reconsider), was clearly leaning Apple's way last month with respect to its continued pursuit of a permanent injunction against Samsung, and based on how today's appellate hearing on Judge Richard Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 12:43 pm
”“In my home state of Ohio, leaders in the fields of biologics research and diagnostics will deliver the cures of tomorrow. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
White v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 12:13 am
[(Holmes v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:23 am
As learned Arnold J stated in SAS v WPL [para 27]:"In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:52 am
of authority (is law always the creature or language or instrument of states?) [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:37 pm
State court support in this field has to be granted in the state where the evidence is located. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 12:50 pm
The independent source doctrine was recently on display in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:45 am
So my reworked materials start with a section on the history and the development of the Fourth Amendment, starting with Entick v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 2:57 am
Siehr recalled the landmark cases of Attorney-General of New Zealand v Ortiz, [1984] AC 1, Winkworth v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 8:33 am
In FTC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:22 pm
Kroessler v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
Committee to Relocate Marilyn v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:31 am
Kelly Tillery of Pepper Hamilton, BCBG's law firm stated:“With respect, the judge just got it wrong. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
Contrary to what the GC had ostensibly held in paragraph 29 of its judgment, the AG observed that freedom of expression ‘clearly applies’ in the field of trade marks, though: in contrast to the fields of arts, culture, and literature, the weight to be given to freedom of expression in the area of trade mark law may be somewhat different, perhaps slightly lighter, in the overall balancing of the rights and interests present. [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:43 am
Allen (Stetson University College of Law) has published “Of Remedies, Juries and State Regulation of Punitive Damages: The Significance of Philip Morris v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 1:08 pm
Based upon Tennessee case law, State of Tennessee v, Korasakov, the breath test is inadmissible. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:39 pm
The case name is Missouri v. [read post]