Search for: "Samuels"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 14,804
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 5:14 pm
appeared first on Samuels Yoelin Kantor LLP.. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 10:26 am
")Samuels has a nice point here, whether or not one entirely agrees with it. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 8:14 am
Personally, I find Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent (joined by Justices John Roberts, Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy) pretty persuasive; this looks a lot more like private speech to me, and the government has an obligation to be neutral between competing expressions: The Court holds that all the privately created messages on the many specialty plates issued by the State of Texas convey a government message rather than the message of the motorist displaying the plate. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:25 pm
All of the Justices were relatively subdued, and two – Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas – did not ask any questions at all. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 5:46 pm
Now, all employers are subject to section 203(m) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regardless of whether the employer uses a tip credit or not.The post 9th Circuit Upholds DOL’s Restrictions on Tip Pooling appeared first on Samuels Yoelin Kantor LLP.. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:39 am
Yesterday’s transcript reveals, however, a rare criminal case in which Justices Ruth Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Samuel Alito were all apparently quickly in agreement, within the first four pages, against Voisine. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
Supreme Court, but Justice Samuel Alito warned that such laws could face a serious constitutional challenge in the future. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:13 pm
But as Justice Samuel Alito observed early and often during the argument, “The problem that is presented by this case is where this constitutional line is going to be drawn. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:33 am
Robert Mnookin, the Samuel Williston Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, Chair of the … Continue reading Mnookin Honored w/ ABA DR Section’s Award for Outstanding Scholarly Work → [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:18 am
Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, faults some states today for insufficiently notifying property owners before “escheating their financial assets” — confiscating them on the grounds that they are supposedly abandoned. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:06 am
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, left, arrives for the funeral of Associate Justice Antonin Scalia at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington on Feb. 20. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:44 am
Daniel Sleddon and brother Samuel. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:46 am
The post Coquine and Rucker – 2016 James Beard Awards Semifinalists appeared first on Samuels Yoelin Kantor LLP.. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:54 pm
[…]The post Information About The Aequitas Investigation appeared first on Samuels Yoelin Kantor LLP.. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
Following the agreement between Russia and the United States over the terms of a “cessation of hostilities” in Syria, the Syrian government and a major opposition group have said that “they will observe a conditional pause in fighting set to begin Saturday, but they also made clear that they expected the exercise to make little difference in the civil war. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 1:05 pm
Charles E. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 8:31 am
Associate Justice, Samuel A. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:09 pm
.'" Ariane de Vogue of CNN.com has a report headlined "Samuel Alito on Supreme Court vacancy: 'We will deal with it.'" And Cristian Farias of The Huffington Post has an article headlined "Samuel Alito On An Eight-Justice Supreme Court: 'We Will Deal With It'; He didn't comment on what kind of justice should fill the late Antonin Scalia's seat. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
Garner's "On Words" column is titled "A 'conversation' with the late, great lexicographer Samuel Johnson. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
Judging by the tone of the questions posed by Chief Justice John Roberts as well as Justices Samuel Alito and Scalia, the three seemed to be aligned in their belief that standing should be limited to those who can show an actual concrete injury rather than those who can allege a mere statutory violation, as the four liberal justices seemed to hold. [read post]
