Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 7,545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2021, 9:46 am
In these cases, people can carry the same viral load as those who do experience symptoms. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 8:13 pm
Norovirus cases were increasing throughout Europe and the Pacific at the same time. [36] One issue with cruise ships is the close contact between people as living quarters are so close, and despite education efforts, there still seems to be a lack of public understanding regarding how the illness is spread. [7, 14] On the other hand, reporting occurs much more quickly in these situations because of the close proximity and concentration of illness, allowing for the quicker detection of… [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:44 pm
[5, 33] Aerosolized vomit has also been implicated as a mode of norovirus transmission. [24] Previously, it was thought that viral shedding ceased approximately 100 hours after infection; however, some individuals continue to shed norovirus long after they have recovered from it, in some cases up to 28 days after experiencing symptoms. [28, 31, 35] Viral shedding can also precede symptoms, which occurs in approximately 30% of cases. [16] Often, an infected food handler may not even show… [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm
Other challenges include the fact that cell culture and small-animal models are limited, host pre-exposure histories are complicated, and there is always the potential for the evolution of novel immune es [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
But people wish they could afford the protections of a lawyer’s solicitor-client relationship instead of having to depend upon merely LegalZoom’s buyer-seller relationship. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
The extraterritorial application of GSCDDL is likely to be troublesome, especially for German operations in China, should Chinese authorities determine that either its provisions or their application violates the newly enacted "Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law of the People's Republic of China" [中华人民共和国反外国制裁法] (discussed HERE). 3. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
It seems unlikely to correspond to the online content people are most concerned about. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:58 pm
If you need to know what the relevant arguments are from each side in Smith v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
But such public subsidy is small potatoes when compared to private media in the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm
Until he tried it with a small boy who saw that the conjurer held two cards together pretending they were one. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
My hypothesis for now is that in the early years of CanLII, the coverage was just too thin to generate more than small-but-steady growth in impact, but that by 2011, the collection covered a big enough range of years to be relied upon by more people, and in turn to have more impact on the form of legal decisions. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 7:11 am
(see Jacobsen v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 3:37 am
Mosley v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Although Donald Trump has insisted that “no one respects women more” than he does, his statements, actions, and record speak volumes to the contrary.Trump v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:06 am
The case under discussion today has the truly odd name of USA v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 8:52 pm
The number is very, very small. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:42 am
And such small portions! [read post]
