Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 27,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
Code § 2510, the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). . . . [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 10:07 am
Clark v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:06 am
However, a May 28, 2015 California appellate court decision, Verdugo v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
Code Ann. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 7:57 am
In the 1980 case Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:19 am
Code § 2252A(a)(2). [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:03 am
As the Supreme Court stated in Iancu v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
" However, in 1947 pursuant to City of Hampton v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
Relying on Damon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:54 am
Penal Code § 190.2(a)(17)(B) (2015). [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:30 am
Wilson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm
In Shell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:15 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:30 pm
Code § 12945.2(a)). [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:47 am
Although the proposed 10,000 square foot building was dimensionally code compliant (see generally Moriarty v Planning Bd. of Vil. of Sloatsburg, 119 AD2d 188, 191), a structure of such size could not be placed into the southwest corner of the lot without encroaching on the existing buffer." [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:47 am
Although the proposed 10,000 square foot building was dimensionally code compliant (see generally Moriarty v Planning Bd. of Vil. of Sloatsburg, 119 AD2d 188, 191), a structure of such size could not be placed into the southwest corner of the lot without encroaching on the existing buffer. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:02 am
See, Ohio v. [read post]
