Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 7221 - 7240
of 10,086
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
______________DeCrescenzo v Gonzalez2007 NY Slip Op 09720Decided on December 11, 2007Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on December 11, 2007 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT A. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 5: Audiovisual works – derivative uses – multimedia e-books This proposed class would allow circumvention of access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures used in connection with multimedia e-book authorship. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 8:45 am
” Felzak v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
(picture, left - Justice Kennedy) The test was whether the invention produced a "useful, concrete and tangible result"(State Street Bank & Trust Co v Signature Financial Group (1998) ). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:39 am
B. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
The Magistrates had refused to state a case for the consideration of the High Court. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:39 am
B. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:39 am
B. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:15 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
Under G.S. 14-72(b)(6), a defendant is eligible to be punished for habitual larceny when the defendant commits a larceny after having been convicted of larceny on four previous occasions. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm
“[B]y postponing the division of the pension until it is received, both parties shared the risk [the state employee] would change jobs or die before retiring, which would reduce the pension substantially or forfeit its benefits completely. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:55 am
Annex I Proposed amendments to Annex B to the Kyoto Protocol The following table shall replace the table in Annex B to the Protocol: Annex B 1 23456 Party Australiaa Austria Belarusc* Belgium Bulgaria* Croatia* Cypruse Czech Republic* Denmark Estonia* European Unionf, g Finland reference 108 92 b n/a 1990 92 b n/a 92 b n/a 95 d 1990 b n/a 92 b n/a 92 b n/a 92 b n/a 92 b n/a 92 b n/a 92… [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
”) Post Grant Admin: Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Parker, a postdoctoral research fellow at Northeastern University, Matthew B. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 1:14 am
The opinion in SEC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
§ 271(e)(2), 21 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm
At present, current unemployment law prohibits consideration of licensing requirements or other state or federal law in determining employee status. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 2:22 pm
Heuer, MARRAMA v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm
(v) conducting, on the agency’s behalf, collective bargaining negotiations under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. [read post]
