Search for: "State v. Howes"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 72,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
eBay defended their position by stating that this was how the search system worked: it automatically purchased the misspelled words as commercial links, redirecting consumers to their website to purchase genuine Louis Vuitton goods.Although the final award was substantially lower than the initial amount claimed by LVMH (a mere €1.2 million), the court was firm in placing the responsibility of the infringement squarely on the shoulders of eBay. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:50 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Eugene Dale Swaney v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:01 am
A recent Tax Court case, Wainwright v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
Bee v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 6:47 am
State authorities were in a better position than an international judge to give an opinion on how best secure the right to respect for private life [72]. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
The task for the trial Judge, the Court of Appeal and now the UK Supreme Court is how to square these two clauses. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:18 am
In the latest case, United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:48 am
(1) Further undermine Roe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:26 am
This is Part III in a series discussing the recent holding in Reliable Fire Equipment v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, and Alaska v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:26 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:16 pm
A few weeks ago, Bob Lawless called the Supreme Court’s decision in Schwab v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
The post Update: Stone Brewing v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 10:46 pm
In the case Brown v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:19 pm
Judge Clifton authors the opinion and holds that, no, the exclusionary rule indeed applies here because even though there may have been a violation of state law, that's not what the warrant was based on: a state judge issues warrants for state violations, and for that, the warrant here was improper. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:09 am
How has its meaning changed over time? [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
Case citation: Soliman v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:24 pm
Another disturbing aspect of the case: There’s also been secrecy about where and how states are getting the new drugs such as Midazolam. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 12:30 pm
No more reversals.We'll see how the U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:35 pm
(Which assuredly wouldn't have been recoverable, or enforced, in any event.)By contrast, in the Ninth Circuit case, guess how much the plaintiffs got there? [read post]
