Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 7221 - 7240 of 14,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
  The Ledbetter  Act is named after a losing plaintiff in an oft-criticized Supreme Court case, Ledbetter v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:54 am by Rick Hasen
We stated that the identity of the corporate speaker does not matter, that independent spending can neither corrupt the election process nor cause the public to lose confidence in the fairness of elections. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:17 pm
  We hope the losing party can somehow settle this and/or obtain a licence to bring this matter to an end. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 3:30 am by Bethany Berger
Like the Nazi use of the pink triangle, the US Supreme Court’s 1903 decision in Lone Wolf v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:45 am by Kysa Crusco
The justices asked some hard questions and made some interesting points, including: On the issue of a constitutional right to home-school, Justice Lynn asked the mother's attorney: The cases you cite were state v. parent, but in this case the state has been forced to settle a dispute between to parents, is there not a difference? [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 1:34 pm
DUI checkpoints have come under some scrutiny in the last few months following a District Court opinion in Guy v State, Case No 2D07-4110 from Florida's Second District Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:31 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Even with all that, their position loses by 12%.Last year, the initiative campaign asked the question in a much better, more neutral way by fairly stating both sides' key argument and asking which one the voter agreed with. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:45 am by Dan Markel
The following post is from GMU's TJ Chiang, an occasional guest with Prawfs: On Monday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:25 am
In a very different context, the conservative majority of the court has engaged in a similar exercise to slam the courthouse doors to civil litigants in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:30 am by Greg Guedel
The Tribal Supreme Court Project is hoping the new appointee will help reverse a disturbing trend – Tribal interests losing nearly every case that comes before the Court. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Both states saw major increases in cigarette smuggling. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:31 am by Lauren Ellerman
Its not simply the time and geographic scope that makes agreements unreasonable, the actual prohibited actions are most often where courts spend their time and analysis.Eastern District of VA (Federal Court) reminded us in State Analysis, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:51 am by Benjamin Wittes
The differences were not limited merely to winning and losing. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]