Search for: "U.S. v. Mark" Results 7221 - 7240 of 11,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2018, 6:55 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
Elena Chachko discussed EU sanctions and international humanitarian law in her examination of the Court of Justice of the European Union case, A v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Status of a spouse named as the primary beneficiary of a life insurance policy or similar instrument in the event the marriage is terminated by divorceSveen, et el v Melin, United State Supreme Court, 584 U.S. ___ (Decided June 11, 2018)Mark Sveen purchased a life insurance policy, naming his then spouse, Kaye Melin, as the primary beneficiary and designating his two children from a prior marriage, Ashley and Antone Sveen, as contingent beneficiaries. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:11 pm
Blueport Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
Ben flagged a recent—and heavily redacted—opinion in the 7th Circuit’s U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The ruling marked the first of its kind involving repatriated funds and tax shifting. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:38 am by Robert Chesney
(v) Capabilities have been established to train cyber operations personnel, test cyber capabilities, and rehearse cyber missions. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
The decision marks a continuation of U.S. efforts to reassure its Eastern European allies concerned over a newly aggressive Russia, and will be the first time that the United States has stored heavy equipment in NATO members from the former Soviet bloc. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 9:39 am by James Billings-Kang
Employees, 567 U.S. 298, 307 (2012) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); Camesi v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Gregory Ablavsky
” This is not simply stirring rhetoric; it represents a repudiation of the elegiac yet resigned attitude toward Native dispossession that has marked the Court’s Indian law decisions as far back as Johnson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:46 am by Susan Brenner
The Court finds that the thrust of [Doyle’s] loss assessment misses the mark. [read post]