Search for: "United States of America v " Results 7221 - 7240 of 8,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Through our strategic partnerships with state and local law enforcement agencies, we are able to make a difference. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:56 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) United States of America v Nolan [2010] EWCA Civ 1223 (09 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Gallagher & Anor, R (on the application of) v Basildon District Council [2010] EWHC 2824 (Admin) (09 November 2010) High Court (Commercial Court) Borealis AB v Geogas Trading SA [2010] EWHC 2789 (Comm) (09 November 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:37 am by Steve Bainbridge
It also highlights the shifting jurisprudence and weakening of First Amendment religion clauses that is leading to new federal and state legislation and eroding protection of religious liberty in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
 Um, last year alone we took about 200 enforcement actions, uh, in plants in the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am by CSL Library News
Solicitor General, judge and vice president of the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:08 am by Dan
It is typically most effective, therefore, to sue a Chinese company in the United States, provided that the Chinese company has assets in the United States or in a country that recognizes U.S judgments. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:06 am by Anna Christensen
Audio recordings of oral arguments in each of the following cases are now available (click on the case name to link to the audio recording): United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:58 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, which challenged whether an individual under surveillance has the right to sue when the government has kept documentation of this surveillance. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:53 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
In Vodopia, the plaintiff, John Vodopia, a former in-house patent attorney for Philips Electronics of North America, alleged that his employment was terminated after various attempts to report that several patents acquired by defendants from an outside company had been obtained through fraud on the United States Patent Office and thus were likely to be declared invalid. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
In Vodopia, the plaintiff, John Vodopia, a former in-house patent attorney for Philips Electronics of North America, alleged that his employment was terminated after various attempts to report that several patents acquired by defendants from an outside company had been obtained through fraud on the United States Patent Office and thus were likely to be declared invalid. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:26 am by tom
JORDAN, PAULA, ET AL. 09-846 UNITED STATES v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Sean Wajert
On the merits of the reconsideration argument, the court said that the NJ holding was at odds with the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in World-Wide Volkswagen and Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]