Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 19,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf discusses last week’s decision in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am
Procedural decisions relating to two major Apple cases have come down this week. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:58 pm
Last week I argued an important case, Mason v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:30 am
The band is well known in legal circles due to their battle with the United States Trademark Office with In Re Tam, which is now before the Supreme Court of the United States and known as Lee v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
In Loving v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
” In Education Week, Christina Samuels and Mark Walsh look at the court’s decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
United States, a unanimous court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm
“I think that that’s unknowable,” Trivett says in reference to whether Baluchi will actually be housed at Camp VII, though Judge Pohl counters that it would be highly likely, especially given the travel ban for detainees to the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:18 am
United States, 497 F.2d 121 (5th Cir. 1974), was itself wrongly decided. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Moore v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:09 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Frank Garrison weigh in on last week’s decision in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
This was the week in which the United Kingdom gave its (possible revocable) notification under Article 50. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 8:01 am
Under the United States Constitution, particularly within the “Confrontation Clause”, and the laws of New York State, the accused individual, or the respondent in a family offense proceeding, will have the right to confront the witnesses presenting evidence against them. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:00 pm
United States Turner v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
This would, for instance, capture a continuing improper or unauthorized use of an alleged trade secret.The court then rejected a constitutional challenge as applied to the facts under the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:27 am
The move is a radical departure from the policy of the Obama administration and also of numerous European allies of the United States, and comes as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday that Assad’s fate “will be decided by the Syrian people. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses the court’s decision this week in Moore v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
The case decided this week is Moore v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
But the court did not reach the question, resolving the case based on the presumption against extraterritoriality because “all the relevant conduct” giving rise to Kiobel’s claims took place outside the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
United States. [read post]
