Search for: "v. JONES"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 9,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm
Academic David Rolph, University of Sydney Faculty of Law, has published “Publication, Innocent Dissemination and the Internet after Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick” ([2010] 33 University of New South Wales Law Journal 562). [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 1:29 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
David Rolph, University of Sydney Faculty of Law, has published Publication, Innocent Dissemination and the Internet after Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick at 33 University of New South Wales Law Journal 562 (2010). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Stephanie Tubbs Jones (Case Law, ’74), D-Ohio, served as Chairwoman of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct when this revision was written. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:09 am
Greg's practice involved a lot of appearances at the Supreme Court, the most recent of which was on October 13 when he argued on behalf of a Texas district attorney in a DNA evidence case in Skinner v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:09 am
Hadley, 431 F.3d 484, 507 (6th Cir. 2005), and United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:56 am
On November 15, 2010, in Fiorentino v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:17 pm
The D.C. ruling (in a case then titled Maynard v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:39 pm
Nov. 22, 2010) (Jones, J.). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm
In Hashi v Birmingham CC, reported in this month's Legal Action, James Stark, to whom we are grateful for the transcript, has succeeded before HHJ Oliver Jones QC in the Birmingham County Court, in arguing that Birmingham failed to take account of the significance of an HHSRS assessment in the context of the definition of homelessness. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm
In Hashi v Birmingham CC, reported in this month's Legal Action, James Stark, to whom we are grateful for the transcript, has succeeded before HHJ Oliver Jones QC in the Birmingham County Court, in arguing that Birmingham failed to take account of the significance of an HHSRS assessment in the context of the definition of homelessness. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm
The D.C. ruling (in a case then titled Maynard v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm
Jones Co., Inc., 776 F.2d 1522 (Fed. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:34 am
Jones and Maynard are co-defendants. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:38 am
"This is analogous to the case of Knight Textile Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:16 am
In this week’s case (Jones v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Jones, __ F.3d _ (D.C. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 11:25 am
The case is Bielunas v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
But while a "diocese" may thus be seen as continuous in the eyes of the Episcopal Church, that entity, as well as the entity that departed the Church, are each still governed by, and subject to, the "First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
