Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 7241 - 7260 of 8,263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:13 am by David Navetta
People’s United Bank (“PATCO”) and JM Test Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Before being appointed to the Arizona Supreme Court, Justice Bolick had been one of the leading libertarian lawyers in the country (he cofounded the Institute for Justice); this is from his opinion today in State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
That suggests that the battles over the scope and application of the concept of a legalized human rights due diligence will continue in the courts and in the strategic decisions of enterprises, and indirectly, the financial sector (to the dismay, of course, of the non governmental sector). [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:11 am by Robert Percival
Korzen, director of the Appellate Advocacy Clinic at the Wake Forest University School of Law, will make his Supreme Court debut in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 11:34 pm
"We're having this pitched battle in court... when it doesn't matter," Freed says. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm by Mary A. Fischer
  On October 13, a new battle over post-conviction DNA testing begins as the Supreme Court hears arguments in Skinner v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 6:34 am by Russell Knight
“the Former Spouses’ Protection Act does not grant state courts the power to treat as property divisible upon divorce military retirement pay that has been waived to receive veterans’ disability benefits” Mansell v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm by Eleonora Rosati
A defence based on honest concurrent use also failed.After a long and hard-fought battle started back in 2015, it is Bentley Clothing that prevails – it got there first, and there was nothing Bentley Motors could do about it. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am by Rogier Bartels
In R v Gul, it noted “that insurgents in non-international armed conflicts do not enjoy combatant immunity” (para. 50). [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]