Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 7241 - 7260 of 16,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2008, 6:14 am
Via Berman, the 2d Circuit has affirmed Judge Lewis Kaplan's dismissal in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
    "The complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice because the plaintiff neglected to plead that she would have prevailed in the underlying action, commenced in the Supreme Court, New York County, but for the defendants' alleged malpractice in failing to file certain motions and appeal from certain orders issued in that action (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; Kuzmin v… [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:25 am by E. R. Wrigley
 To establish a philosophical belief, not least to establish, if such be necessary, all the underlying facts set out [by Mr Nicholson] … it is plain that cross examination is likely to be needed. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am by Jorge Miranda
For Part I click here, for Part II click here, for Part III click here, for Part IV click here, for Part V click here, for Part VI click here. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:30 am
Because the Majority denied the defendants’ cross-motion in part and reinstated the Labor Law sec. 240 (1) claim, the order is non-final. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Illott v The Blue Cross & Ors, heard 12 December 2016. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The first high-profile libel trial of 2022 began last week with Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
Cal. 2020) (citing statistics that only 2.5% of Uber trips crossed state lines and only 10% of all trips began or ended at airports); Hinson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
On February 1, a unanimous five-judge panel of the New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which is based in Buffalo, ruled in Martinez v. [read post]