Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 7241 - 7260 of 7,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
* * * Therefore, we dismiss Parkevich's appeal from the trial court's denial of her Petition to Re-Docket. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:11 pm
Code § 1498(b).Can you see where this is going? [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:04 am
’’ (E) Other Natural or Manmade Factors Affecting Its Continued Existence... [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:09 pm
Also in brief, the answers are as follows: a) No b) No c) The period from the signing of the first CFA (depending on the second CFA’s terms d) Where the first CFA did not provide for a success fee, no. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, August 01, 2008 In re: Navy Chaplaincy, No. 07-5359 "In a suit by Navy chaplains alleging that the Navy's retirement system discriminates in favor of Catholic chaplains in violation of the Establishment Clause, dismissal for lack of standing is affirmed where: 1) plaintiffs conceded that they had not suffered employment discrimination themselves; 2) plaintiffs lacked standing as taxpayers; and 3) standing did not arise from injury alleged to flow… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 2:46 am
(AP) - Some of the nation's worst sex offenders will no longer receive federal financial aid for college while they're confined in treatment centers (Civil Commitment Centers) under a bill approved by Congress.A little-noticed provision approved by the House and Senate yesterday makes those offenders ineligible for Pell Grants starting July 1, 2009. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 5:35 pm
This is because the decision is the first to issue as a result of the new EPC2000 provision of Article 112a that allows for a petition for review of a decision of a lower board to the enlarged board but (and it's a big but) only if:"(a) a member of the Board of Appeal took part in the decision in breach of Article 24, paragraph 1, or despite being excluded pursuant to a decision under Article 24, paragraph 4;(b) the Board of Appeal included a person not appointed as a… [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:05 pm
If you've ever secretly read somebody else's email 537 times, turns out you're not alone. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 3:17 pm
The posts will start shortly (Dave Bs already got his first up…), but we here at Slaw would like to welcome our new Dave’s! [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
B. 1769) (Lord Chief Justice Wilmot), "to deter from any such proceeding for the future," Wilkes, supra, at 19, 98 Eng. [read post]