Search for: "In Interest of Jones"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 7,330
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2007, 9:46 pm
Another of the IPKat's friends, Dr Michelle Jones (Astex Therapeutics) has drawn his attention to a valuable post on IPEG concerning something he missed elsewhere - the thumbs-down given to the European Patent Litigation Agreement by the European Parliament's Legal Service. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 5:56 am
I will compile statistics for U.S. law schools, but feel free to report hires to non-U.S. institutions that would be of interest to the readers of "Legal Theory Blog. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 1:49 am
The district court properly considered DFS' efforts to reunify this family and Appellant's efforts to rehabilitate herself over the entire three year period these children were in foster care, and the district court reasonably concluded the interests of the children in a safe and stable home outweighed Appellant's rights as a parent.Affirmed.J. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:28 pm
An interesting new article just appeared in print, if we do say so ourselves.One of your cohosts (Herrmann) and one of his colleagues at Jones Day (Pearson Bownas) published "Making Book on the MDL Panel" in today's issue of BNA's Class Action Litigation Report. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 3:30 pm
Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, and soon Jones are all relatively new to the Court. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 1:30 pm
But for now, the 2-1 decision represents a big win for the co-lead plaintiffs lawyer in the case, Brad Seligman, the founder of the Impact Fund, a Berkeley, Calif., non-profit organization that, among other things, bring "public interest impact litigation. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:55 pm
App., February 6, 2007), and Jones v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:12 am
Now a federal judge has ruled that the new limits imposed on inmate musicians in the wake of the controversy are not unconstitutional -- even though groups performing religious music are accorded more freedom.
Associates React to Jones Day and Weil Gotshal Salary Raises
The Recorder
Jones Day and Weil, Gotshal & Manges have joined the list of law firms paying California first-year associates $160,000 rather than the $145,000 embraced by most homegrown firms. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:44 pm
Today was a little more interesting than yesterday. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 8:25 am
For example, I use Nan Hunter's Power of Procedure, a study of the Paul Jones v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 1:32 pm
David Jones is suing the Australia Institute over claims the giant retailer's advertising sexually exploited children. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 7:38 am
It will be interesting to see how fresh thinking and practitioner blood will work in academe. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:24 pm
And yes, the visionary idealist who gave New York Lincoln Center and Jones Beach, along with parks, roads, playgrounds and public pools. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:12 am
Sorrell, which is of significance to admiralty practitioners because a seaman's statutory remedy for personal injury due to negligence - the Jones Act - expressly incorporates the liability standards applicable to railroad accidents.
Law Firm Partnership LawFriday, January 26, 2007By Arthur J. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:00 am
Interesting article in this week's National Law Journal: More Law Profs Consult at Firms; But Moonlighting Can Raise Red Flags, by Leigh Jones: [Laurence] Tribe is just one of many high-profile legal scholars who have outside jobs with law firms... [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 8:01 am
Democrat Jim McReynolds is CBO with Delwin Jones of Lubbock and Pat Haggerty of El Paso rounding out the GOP members, all of whom were on the committee last time. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:43 am
Jones said in the letter. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:42 am
The force used in this case was clearly less than that determined to be de minimis in Durruthy, Vinyard, Nolin and Jones. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 3:45 pm
Lawford's interest in developing searchable computer databases for legal materials developed in the mid-1960s, and by September 1968, he had entered into discussions with I.B.M. to establish a project of "considerable proportions. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
The Second Restatement conditions negligence per se liability on violation of an enactment that met four "purposes":(a) to protect a class of persons which includes the onewhose interest is invaded, and(b) to protect the particular interest which is invaded, and(c) to protect that interest against the kind of harm which has resulted, and(d) to protect that interest against the particular hazardfrom which the harm results.Restatement (Second) of Torts … [read post]
