Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 12,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2022, 7:00 am
Here is the opinion: mask-mandate-order [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 7:17 am
The full brief, which makes fun of the Chief Justice and gleefully commits several other cardinal sins of Supreme Court advocacy, is available here. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 11:58 am
So if you're a plain language type, that's the end of it.But Justice Margulies comes out the other way. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:18 pm
My opinion: Nonsense. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm
I make the argument that we're really down to Three. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
Although some reporters have written that the three-justice court of review's Oct. 11 decision in In Re: Honorable Sharon Keller was only a technical victory for Keller, she doesn't see it that way. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:42 am
We're lawyers. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:46 pm
Here's the dissenting opinion of Justice Guzman. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm
Notably, Whittemore was adjudicated by Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story while on circuit duty. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:03 am
Treasury Department has taken a very narrow and, in my opinion and the NAIC’s opinion, incorrect view of the authorizing language in Title I, Subtitle A of the Dodd-Frank Act by claiming that I represent the state of Missouri and not the insurance regulatory system. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:37 pm
Individually, they're worthless, they're anecdotal. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:32 pm
The full opinion is here (pdf.) [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm
If that makes little sense to you, you're in good company. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
Link to Opinion: Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
In a unanimous opinion by Justice Thomas, the Court answered “no. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
See the new opinion here. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:36 am
© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 8:19 am
As a bonus, the short opinion refutes many of the standard “conservative” attacks on Section 230. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Justice Ginsberg’s opinion in Johnson doesn’t reject that reasoning, but rejects the result, relying on three prior Supreme Court decisions: the 1977 decision in Pennsylvania v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 9:12 am
"And I'm not sure, based on what I know at this point, that that would be in the interest of justice anyway." [read post]
