Search for: "Mark Case" Results 7241 - 7260 of 70,965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 3:22 am
" (E.g., THE VENICE COLLECTION, NEW YORK WAYS GALLERY, HAVANA CLIPPER (rum)).Applicant relied on; In re Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha, 120 USPQ2d 1738 (TTAB 2016) in arguing that "[t]he inclusion of a distinctive term in combination with a geographic term will operate to prevent the mark from having a primary significance that is geographic," but the Board found that case to be distinguishable. [read post]
30 May 2017, 2:58 am
Concluding that the Board had applied an "incorrect standard for fame," the CAFC remanded the case to the TTAB for determination utilizing the correct standard. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 3:24 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
In Eurostar, the Board held that "in a case involving likelihood of confusion, we should not exercise our authority under Section 18 to permit an action to restrict an application or registration where such a restriction is divorced from the question of likelihood of confusion. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:23 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
30 May 2019, 3:28 am
”As to appearance and sound, the Board found the marks dissimilar. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:10 am
In any case, Hunter presented ample evidence to show that the mark had acquired distinctiveness prior to June 21, 2010. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:27 am
"The Board ruled that, based on the unique evidence in this case, that applicant had proven acquired distinctiveness for the composite logo marks.Conclusion: The Board affirmed the genericness refusal as to the standard character mark SERIAL, but it reversed that refusal as to the two logo marks. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:34 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark PURPLE HAZE for "electronic sound pickup for guitars and basses," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark HAZE for "sound amplifiers. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:39 am by Bill Heinze
The CAFC ruled that the Board had improperly applied the materiality test of Section 2(e)(3) because it failed to consider whether a substantial portion of all relevant consumers (not just Russian speakers) is likely to be deceived: In this case, as in every case, in order to establish a prima facie case of materiality there must be some indication that a substantial portion of the relevant consumers would be materially influenced in the decision to… [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 8:29 pm
The rules are simple enough: (1) I will try to keep you up to date when the Court grants certiorari, decides argued cases, or takes other action that is interesting to me [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases and Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness appeals account for the vast majority of final decisions in ex parte cases. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 10:19 am by The Mussallem Law Firm, P.A.
 With traffic tickets and all criminal cases in Duval County and the surrounding counties, the clerk’s office assigns a case number and a case record in every case. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 10:19 am by The Mussallem Law Firm, P.A.
 With traffic tickets and all criminal cases in Duval County and the surrounding counties, the clerk’s office assigns a case number and a case record in every case. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court, which may mark the first time that the high court's justices decide what may be printed on fake tombstones in your front yard. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:57 am by John L. Welch
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark HEALTH VILLAGE for rental, sales, management, and development of real estate, based on Applicant's refusal to disclaim the word VILLAGE. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:08 am by Glenn Reynolds
MARK TAPSCOTT ON JOURNALISTIC PREJUDICE: Why is Gang of Six plan “practical” but Cut, Cap and Balance will never pass? [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:35 am by Adam Weinstein
The attorneys at Gana LLP are experienced in representing investors in cases where their broker has acted inappropriately. [read post]