Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 12,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2016, 7:32 am
But does the analogy work at the next level? [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 11:15 am
The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, a federal appellate court one level below the Supreme Court, recently entered a ruling in the case of Cooper v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
A prime example was Bush v Gore, in which the United States Supreme Court was called on to resolve an election dispute. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
Featured today is the Sixth Circuit's recent decision in Hirsch v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
These school districts justify these policies based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Plyler v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 1:42 pm
Case Background: In Orthofix, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 11:26 am
Supreme Court in Bostock v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:37 pm
Va.) in B.P.J. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:39 am
Other laboratory tests v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:49 am
People ex rel. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:18 am
The employer’s motion was granted (Kuebler v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:31 am
To suggest that the simple answer is to place them with others at birth belies a misunderstanding of people at the deepest level. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Bennett v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:45 pm
” Apparently, that method wasn’t convicting enough people. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:10 am
So, if [and ONLY if, growls the Kat] you (i) love trade marks, (ii) either know how to blog or are willing to learn, (iii) are professionally or academically competent to discuss trade mark issues, (iv) possess a high level of literacy and proficiency in English and (v) you or your employer are a member of MARQUES, Jeremy would love to hear from you. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
Supreme Court in Shaffer v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:13 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm
The federal ban that the Supreme Court upheld in Gonzales v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:25 pm
This act shall take effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 10, 2011, if adjournment sine die is on May 11, 2011); except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part shall not take effect unless approved by the… [read post]
