Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 51,417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 1:49 pm
The story of Glossip v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
Vehicle search justified by search incident to arrest exception to warrant requirement U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:49 pm
Lindh v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 11:57 am
The recently published case Cheal v El Camino Hospital out of Santa Clara (2014)is a classic example of a situation where the whole case rested one witness statement. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:33 pm
People lie to their attorneys. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:42 pm
One such recent case is U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 1:58 am
Rapp based his case on the 1987 US Supreme Court case Houston v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Thank you to "an anonymous friend" for bringing this case to my attention.In the context of a restitution motion, in United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:21 pm
(Orin Kerr) A petition for rehearing was recently filed in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:13 am
In Hively v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:13 am
In Hively v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
That case, which is celebrated as saving privacy in the United States, articulated the principle that “the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 11:42 am
A judge would likely reduce them to reflect what the Supreme Court of Canada had to say in a trilogy of cases decided circa 1978 starting with Andrews v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
Headley v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:02 pm
After long proceedings at national level, a preliminary ruling by the CJEU on 16 December 2008 (Case C-73/07), and after the Court of Human Rights Chamber judgment of 21 July 2015, the Grand Chamber on 27 June 2017 finally found no violation of the right to freedom of expression and information in Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
They are not (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]).Wilt (which is still good law), offers an important lesson. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
They are not (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]).Wilt (which is still good law), offers an important lesson. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
In my personal experience, I find that many people believe that they can present their case better orally than in writing. [read post]
