Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 13,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm
The fate of the case, Al Janko v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:50 am
An H-1B dependent employer, approximately 90 percent of CAMO’s workforce (42 out of 48 employees) is composed of H-1B nonimmigrant workers — foreign nationals who are admitted to the United States for a temporary period of time for a specific purpose, such as to work in “specialty occupations” or study, provided their employer files proper applications with the DOL and Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:10 pm
The government relies, as it did in the court below (and as the district court did), on the 1949 case of United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:16 am
Vacating an NLRB order on an employer’s petition for review, the Fourth Circuit determined that the Board did not have a valid quorum (Gestamp South Carolina, LLC v NLRB, October 16, 2013, per curiam). [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:49 am
Photo by Steve Barrett On March 18, 2013, a Petition for Writ of Certiorari was granted in the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States and the National Association of Manufacturers filed an amicus brief in support of the company’s petition. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:50 pm
At the opening of this Term, it granted review of United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether criminal defendants whose assets have been frozen have a right to a pretrial hearing to challenge the basis for the charges against them so that they can use the assets to hire their counsel of choice. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm
” In its brief on the merits, the United States starts by reiterating that, under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:43 pm
[3] See Consent Decree, United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
This morning, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
United States (12-1493). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
Sims 12-1217 Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 8:30 am
Conopco, Inc. and Unilever United States, Inc., Docket No., 13-cv-00732 (S.D. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm
In the case of Daimler/Chrysler AG v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
