Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 8,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In light of the DOJ’s promise to use the FCA to improve cybersecurity, federal contractors should refamiliarize themselves with the Supreme Court’s 2016 holding in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:46 pm
Perhaps not, considering that Branstad said recently, "What the people of Iowa want is an opportunity to vote on marriage defined as one man and one woman. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:21 am
This year one of the cases I discovered was People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:43 pm
In Perfect 10 v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
The census citizenship question case (New York et al. v Dep't of Commerce, back in the SDNY after remand from the Supreme Court in June) has taken a strange new turn. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Time and experience have undercut American Pipe's concern about the judicial system's inability to process individual lawsuits that would be filed absent class action tolling.Second, the Supreme Court's assertion that absent class members reasonably rely on the pendency of a class action to postpone filing individual complaints is simply not true in the context of mass tort class actions.In some class action contexts -- allegations of discrimination at one manufacturing plant, or… [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
Turner and associate Alexandra Hamilton, the piece announces unnecessarily that agencies issue a great deal of guidance, as demonstrated by the case Appalachian Power Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:12 am
I was able to slip in part way through the afternoon session, and whilst I was there a number of people slipped silently in, and out, assisted by a friendly security guard on the door. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 10:31 am
Mind you, people could always use Bing. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
But this is also no small deal. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:09 am
Given the high screening costs charged, on a per shipment basis, by most solution providers, this will prove to be an important means of ensuring that UFLPA compliance is within the grasp of big and small importers alike. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Indeed, this is a core concern of public choice theory–the ability of small, concentrated groups to get the way against the opposition of larger groups where the costs (though larger than the total benefits) are widely dispersed. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:23 pm
(Campbell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
The decision is here: Barnes v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:30 am
Graham v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 12:02 pm
-Ed V. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
However, as the Supreme Court made perspicuous in CCH Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:37 pm
Our estimates for the effect of damage caps on Part A spending are small and not statistically significant. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:57 pm
Not in the Fifth Circuit, and not if you have screwed up your damages claim.Enter MGE UPS Systems v. [read post]