Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 7241 - 7260 of 10,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm by kmckay
(v) conducting, on the agency’s behalf, collective bargaining negotiations under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm by chief
That offer was contained in a letter which stated that: [W]e only have to offer you accommodation once. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm by chief
That offer was contained in a letter which stated that: [W]e only have to offer you accommodation once. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
 In particular, the bill states: (b) EFFECTIVE DATE. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The first CUSMA Panel,[9] found that Canada’s practice of reserving 85-100% of dairy TRQs for processors violated Article 3.A.2.11(b) of CUSMA. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
P. 35(b) motion claiming that warden's alleged promise to create an opportunity for a sentence reduction as a reward for his assistance in prison effectively bound the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion on his behalf, judgment denying relief is affirmed where: 1) even if the warden did promise to file a Rule 35(b) motion, a warden within the Bureau of Prisons was unauthorized to make the motion as the "government" under Rule 35(b); and 2) a… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by New Books Script
[Toronto, Ont. : Magistrates' Courts], 1965 KF 224 B568 B53 1965 V.4 Regina vs. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False marking false marking false marking all at up to $500 per offense: Simonian v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False marking false marking false marking all at up to $500 per offense: Simonian v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new cases are Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. [read post]