Search for: "State v. Force" Results 7241 - 7260 of 32,553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2021, 7:00 am by Unknown
“Three Branches of Coping with Statelessness Risk in Colombia,” Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration, vol. 9, no. 1 (Dec. 2020) [full-text]- Scroll to p. 134.Related post:- Thematic Focus: Statelessness & Nationality (13 Jan. 2021)  [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:55 am
Sophie Papadileris, Protection of Peacekeepers Resorting to Armed Force – A Current Dilemma German Practice Guido Hildner, The Activation of the International Criminal Court’s Jurisdiction over the Crime of Aggression: The Edifice is Completed Helmut Philipp Aust & Mehrdad Payandeh, German Practice With Regard to the Use of Force in Syria Sara Jötten & Felix Machts, Ban on Strike Action for Civil Servants is Constitutional: The Judgment of the Federal… [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:30 am
At the same time, more employees have fallen into a grey area of who is an “exempt v. non-exempt” employee. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:56 am by Lev Sugarman
Pildes analyzed the 1983 Supreme Court decision in INS v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:03 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In a case with the potential to truly shake-up the current state of patent litigation, the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in the patent venue case TC Heartland v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:30 am
Constructive dismissalGraziano v NYS Division of State Police, USDC, SDNY, 198 F. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:29 am by Dwight Sullivan
A kind reader has informed us that the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in a precedential ruling, has affirmed the dismissal of the birther suit in Kerchner v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am by Rory Little
United States), that the Justices were simply tired from the first argument, in Yates v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]