Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 45,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
In Kligler v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2120 (Admin) - read judgment The High Court has found that the Secretary of State unlawfully detained a mentally ill foreign national who was awaiting deportation. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011). [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:18 am
For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/eff-petition-graham-v-us For more on these cases:https://www.eff.org/cases/united-states-v-graham Contact: JenniferLynchSenior Staff Attorneyjlynch@eff.org AndrewCrockerStaff Attorneyandrew@eff.org Share this: Join EFF [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:52 am
Sure issued his decision in Regan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 5:44 am
People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:07 am
In People v Kilpatrick, defendant Kwame Kilpatrick challenged the constitutionality of the Michigan statute that allowed the trial court to enter an order requiring that all proceeds from the sale of his book be placed in escrow to pay restitution to the city of Detroit. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:04 pm
Right to Travel and state control of terminations --Here one enters the world of state barriers to national coherence and coordination targeting activities between people of different states, one of which makes available what the orther bans--conspiracy, complicity, aiding; private attorney general provisions and the like --The BATTLE OF THE STATES is already emerging (from Bloomberg 4 May 2022): Missouri S.B. 8, Missouri state Rep. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:38 am
State of N.Y. ex rel. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
In support of the lawsuit, the ACLU referred the court to the 2012 case of Arizona v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:48 am
The Washington State Supreme Court, in State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 9:08 am
The Court also denied rehearing in People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 3:43 pm
Because people on the Commission are, I'm confident, not merely bureaucrats, but are rather people. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 6:18 am
State v. [read post]
Defendant asleep inside had no veto power over consent, and the police did not have to ask him first
11 Oct 2007, 5:49 am
People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:59 pm
" The court then ruled that "all proceeds" traceable drug trafficking are subject to forfeiture, even if they are increased due to a windfall.The People of the State of Illinois v. $35,315 United States Currency, 2016 IL App (4th) 150685. [read post]
