Search for: "True the Vote" Results 7241 - 7260 of 11,936
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
 CBS today reported that Roberts did indeed change his vote in May, although the reasons for that about-face remain unclear. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm by Randy Barnett
 The same was true of why five of the nine Supreme Court justices ruled the way they did on the remedy issue in Bush v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm by Lovechilde
We’re ruining their reputations and careers with no true evidence. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
  As is often true, that political debate will have no noticeable legal consequences; it might change some votes. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
Name one Republican that voted for Obamacare. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:23 am by Karl-Friedrich Lenz
That can’t possibly be true. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:55 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: "Europe declares independence from Hollywood with ACTA vote" http://pjblack.me/N8hvEn #lwb486 "Why the Internet Isn't Going to End College As We Know It" http://pjblack.me/Osc1ZW #highered "Concerts Don't Have to Suck: The Rules" http://pjblack.me/N8ayDk "He Texts, She Tweets—Are They E-Compatible? [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Gee, courts never think this is true when there’s free riding on a trademark. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:40 am by Randy Barnett
Stand by those principles, be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:49 am
“Permitted transferee” means that though shares are held by A, all rights of voting, management, right to sell etc., are vested in Y. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:57 am by Lovechilde
We’re learning more about why we shouldn’t vote for someone than why we should. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:35 pm by Ilya Somin
For example, if it is true that some two-thirds of what eventually became the dissenting opinion was initially drafted by Roberts, that makes it more likely that he had a strong belief that the mandate is unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm by Lovechilde
It is time to take the vote away from the fans again. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:42 am by Rekha Arulanantham
The North Carolina General Assembly voted yesterday to override Gov. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:39 am by Emily Brennan
It looks as though Roberts initially voted to strike the law down and then switched sides. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:09 am by Rick Garnett
Third, I certainly hope it is not true -- I am confident that it is not -- that the Chief changed his vote merely because some critics were (lamely, I think) anticipatorily complaining that it would be activist, illegitimate, etc., etc., for the Court to strike down the law. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:27 am by Brian Wolfman
(Which is true for most Spending Clause programs, which is why states participate in the first place.) [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:44 pm
At the conference after the oral arguments, she says, Roberts voted with the conservative group that the commerce power did not support the mandate, but Roberts was "less clear" on severability. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:25 pm by Duncan Hollis
For starters, under the current rules of procedure, the treaty’s adoption will require consensus, meaning one State (think the US or Russia) could block it (it is possible though that a text supported by a sufficient number of States might be put before the UN General Assembly itself, which requires only a super-majority vote). [read post]