Search for: "United States of America v " Results 7241 - 7260 of 8,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2017, 1:08 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
[xiv] DeGenaro, supra note 1, at 1043-1044 (citing See Horoshi Motomura, Americans In Waiting: The Lost History of Immigration and Citizenship in the United States, 151, 160-167 (2006) (arguing United States immigration policy has created a distinction between citizens and noncitizens in a way that discriminates against even lawful immigrations and the only way to cure this is to integrate immigrant populations); see also Kevin R. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 am by Gritsforbreakfast
,' that was really just a mike check for the Obama administration," joked Perry, who drew a standing ovation.He called the federal government's secret surveillance into America's phone records a "fundamental misuse of the massive power of the federal government," and added, "These acts are something I would expect to see out of China but not out of the United States." [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(IP tango)   Switzerland Further step to Swiss Federal Patent Court (EPLAW)   United Kingdom Reminder: an appeal is not a re-hearing: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (PatLit) Stretching copyright with contract: Global Coal Ltd v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm by Guest Blogger
But Supreme Court legal doctrine tells only part of the story of free expression in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Following the United States Supreme Court’s twisted rulings in Baze v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:40 pm by admin
  Each little sperm that you release has the potential to grow into a dentist, a professional athlete, or even President of the United States of America. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 10:17 am by Edward T. Kang
Constitution articulate that citizens of United States are guaranteed the right to a trial by jury in criminal and civil cases. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]