Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 14,004
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 6:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
Except for some enlightened counties in Nevada, prostitution remains criminalized in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 3:30 am
(Decision: The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer – PDF). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:30 pm
As Zalman Rothschild shows in a forthcoming study, judicial disagreements about Covid restrictions in the United States have closely tracked judges' partisan identities. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:56 am
None of the major ISPs in the United States, however, has signed on yet. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:20 am
Williams (@PaulWilliamsDC), Alexandra Koch (@alexandraekoch) and Lilian Waldock The American Servicemembers’ Protection Act and the Dodd Amendment: Shaping United States Engagement with the ICC (Part II) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh and Isabelle Glimcher (@IsGlimcher) The Binding Interpretation by the Office of Legal Counsel of the Laws Constraining US Engagement with the ICC (Part III) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh… [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 6:49 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:14 am
State, 86 NY2d 307 [1995]). [*4]" [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:15 pm
Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in Hardt v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:05 am
., et al v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
Rick aptly calls this “the most banana republic moment in the United States I could recall in two and a half decades of professionally following elections” (p. 66). [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:04 pm
Orrick will be keeping a close eye on the myriad rulings that are sure to follow this landmark case. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
This is important because by one count there are close to 1,700 alleged human rights violators and war criminals here in the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:15 am
Texas Tort Claims Act 42 U.S.Code §1983 provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory … subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:52 am
Given how important our vote is for the most important office in the world, these communications raise huge issues and questions of what is allowed under the law.In 2010 the Supreme Court of the United States made a ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
Between that date and 7 January 1998 the record in the case (the parties' written pleadings) was open and closed on a number of occasions at the request of the parties and with the leave of the court to allow for adjustment of their pleadings.# The applicant was then informed by the court that, since part of his claim challenged one of the orders made in the Sheriff Court proceedings, he was required to intimate a copy of the closed record to the relevant sheriff clerk. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:23 am
The 4th Circuit's ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
., patent or trade mark infringement, (2) importation, sale for importation, or sale after importation into the United States of the accused products, and (3) the existence of a domestic industry relating to the product in question. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:54 am
Though perhaps illogical, the verdicts may stand ( see, United States v. [read post]
