Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 7241 - 7260 of 10,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
 Is this, asks Merpel, the first time an appeal in any IP proceedings in the United Kingdom has been dealt with by a predominantly female tribunal? [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
What an enchanting, mysterious title, how mellifluously it rolls off the tongue -- and how surprised he was, as a feline with very little French, to discover that this body was not a purveyor of soufflés or tasty chocolates at all, but a maker of presumably inedible rubber flooring  products. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 10:10 am by Hina Shamsi
Since 2003, the U.S. government has operated a No Fly List that indefinitely bars U.S. citizens and residents from flying to, from, or over the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 8:52 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Bill De La Rosa and Zachary Neilson-Papish, Sept. 10, 2024 "The language we use to describe people living in the United States without authorization can reveal our political positions on immigration. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:42 am by Florian Mueller
I just watched the live webcast of today's hearing of the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights of the Judiciary Committee of the United States Senate on "Standard Essential Patent [SEP] Disputes and Antitrust Law". [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
There appears little public inclination, however, to think the unthinkable. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am by Jeff Gamso
United States (which I've written about before) and you can read the opinions here. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:47 am by Cindy Cohn
In the case of the United States, in addition to the computer servers, giant analysis buildings, weak or wrong legal justifications, and the secret price tag, one of the lasting and more harmful effects has been on the public. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:21 am
This Kat was so reminded in revisiting the 2013 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Already LLC dba Yums v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:51 pm by Florian Mueller
The Supreme Court of the United States is concerned with proper interpretation of what Congress decides, and not with making policy judgments for Congress.I'm not going to discuss the frequently-cited SAS Institute v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 11:26 pm
" "This Court is sworn to protect and defend the constitution of the United States of America, not the foreclosure fraud of Bank of America or HSBC. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am by Alfred Brophy
Board of Education: the idea is that the Supreme Court supported Brown because it served the United States’ cold war agenda of supporting human rights. [read post]