Search for: "AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTIONÂ "
Results 7261 - 7280
of 8,652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2010, 9:49 pm
It is a principle of English law that a person who appears in a police court has done something undesirable, and citizens who take it upon themselves to do unusual actions which attract the attention of the police should be careful to bring these actions into one of the recognized categories of crimes and offences, for it is intolerable that the police should be put to the pains of inventing reasons for finding them undesirable. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
Employers insist that federal laws against discrimination in the workplace make the employer liable only for the actions of an employee or supervisor who takes a discriminatory action — that is, only where there is a direct link between the hostile attitude and the resulting action, otherwise the action is independent of the “animus” toward the affected worker. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:37 am
Category: FYI;New in the Library Body: There is a new volume for American Law Reports 6th series. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:02 pm
If the American people stand by, the opposition doesn’t need a con-con or anything else. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm
Dunlap own two parcels in northern Washington state in the city of Nooksack, which appears to us to be just a short American Goldfinch flight from the Canadian-American border (the Goldfinch is the official State Bird of Washington...work with us here). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:13 pm
In Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana, shareholders of American International Group (“AIG”) initiated a derivative action on behalf of AIG against certain of its senior officers. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
The early Americans would have supported that. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:44 pm
American Amusement Machine Co., 01-239). [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
Aguilar says that Americans must feel as if the SEC will use whatever tools and powers at its disposal to protect investors from. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:23 pm
This is a win-win-win for the environment, businesses and the American consumer. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:21 am
The American law of religious exemptions says “no,” because that law is in this respect individualistic. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
§ 1988 in an action based on a dismissal of a claim, when the plaintiff has asserted other interrelated and non-frivolous claims; and 2) whether it is improper to award defendants all of the attorney's fees they incurred in an action under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:45 am
Bush’s Administration tried to justify its actions in terms of international law, claiming, for example, that a previous U.N. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am
A corporation must, therefore, be responsible for the acts of its authorized agents even if particular acts were unauthorized (see Ruggles v American Cent. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:53 am
These companies are led in this area by the American Association of Advertising Agencies (4A’s), the American Advertising Federation (AAF), the Association of National Advertisers (ANA), the Direct Marketing Association (DMA), and the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:15 am
If Gallup and Pew find that 70% percent of Americans have swung behind the President at a time of real or imagined crisis, this paves the way for President Righty or Lefty to take drastic steps in the name of the People – pointing to his high poll numbers to justify unilateral action if Congress doesn’t succumb to all of his extreme demands. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:03 pm
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is torn between general principle and particularity in considering important questions of separation of powers in American constitutional law – just as had been an earlier decision that, in some respects, it both repudiated and modeled, Freytag v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
American Express Co. et al. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
In short, Nelson and I did not voice any objection to the principle of “due process of law” as briefly explicated in Hurtardo. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:13 am
To impose the burdens of speech on natural persons alone is to honor the American design of capitalism. [read post]
