Search for: "California v. Law" Results 7261 - 7280 of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  The district court rejected the notion that such time is compensable under California law and, earlier this month, the Ninth Circuit agreed in Cazares v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am by Rick
That the medical marijuana laws of the State of California, created both by the voters of California and the elected representatives of the State of California, are routinely ignored by the unelected law enforcement officers of the State of California is not really the focus of this blog article, however. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:53 pm by Jennifer Lynch
Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 6:36 am by Mark J. Levin and Steven W. Suflas
  She wrote: If this court’s understanding of state law is wrong, California courts, in an appropriate case, will have the last word. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:04 pm
"It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 26, 2023, be modified as follows:On page 11, in lines 5 and 6 of footnote 4, delete the phrase “Tak Chun distastefully implies” and replace it with the phrase “Tak Chun’s comparison could be read to distastefully imply” so the full footnote reads as follows:Tak Chun’s comparison to our Supreme Court’s decision in In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757 is ill conceived, for this decision… [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
The two most important precedential decisions the courts rely on in such cases are California Supreme Court cases: White v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:00 am by Derek Chaiken
Case law in California generally protects an “innocent insured” even if they are head over feet with the not so innocent insured. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:12 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Monday, September 30, 2013:Kingston Penitentiary’s storied history full of notorious inmates, riots, escapes R v Griffith: What Happens When a Judge Changes His/Her Mind? [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:24 pm by Meg
The Justice Department filed papers today in federal court in California in the case of Smelt and Hammer v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:03 am
 "HealthPort has followed the same process at all of its California locations since May 1, 2009. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 2:15 pm
California's appellate courts will soon begin issuing opinions helping to formulate the required jury instructions that will need to be given in light of Philip Morris v. [read post]