Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 12,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 4:47 pm
C. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Pharmaciens (Ordre professionnel des) c. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:58 am
Another non-drug/device case recently caught our eye, not only because it allows us to parody Shakespeare, but because of its potential implication for all those companies that are based in New Jersey and get sued under the liberal New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act as a result (and as we all know, there is a considerable drug/device presence in the Garden State). [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:58 am
Niles, and Justin C. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:30 am
b. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 6:23 am
C. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 3:58 am
B. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 2:03 am
It’s worth noting that Starbucks is a Washington company, not Delaware. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:11 pm
The question you pose – whether you should agree to a mutual release – depends on several factors, including: a) how important is it that you obtain a release from your ex-employee; b) if you do not offer a mutual release, do you think it likely that your former employee will turn down the severance package and initiate litigation; c) would litigating your ex-employee’s claims have ramifications beyond just your ex-employee;… [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 3:09 am
Here are the highlights from the SEC’s Fact Sheet: Submission Thresholds – amend Rule 14a-8(b) by: – Replacing the current ownership threshold, which requires holding at least $2,000 or 1% of a company’s securities for at least one year, with three alternative thresholds that will require a shareholder to demonstrate continuous ownership of at least: – $2,000 of the company’s securities for at least three years; – $15,000 of the… [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Peregrine and Ashley C. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:23 am
Such individual has been and will continue to be free from control or direction over the performance of such services, both under his contract of service and in fact; and B. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
The Sentry recommends that sanctions architects consider four factors when designing network sanctions: (a) Sanctions are most effective when imposed multilaterally; (b) sanctions are more effective when attached to clearly articulated policy goals; (c) sanctions must include from the outset a well-defined exit strategy to delist individuals or companies, or even to end entire programs when warranted; and (d) sanctions must be consistently maintained, updated and adjusted… [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:09 pm
However you feel about Big Tech, rest assured that the EO’s effects will not be confined to the small group of companies that can afford to navigate these choppy waters. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:59 am
The plaintiff, Cipla Limited (CL) is a well-known Indian pharma company, while the defendant, Cipla Industries Pvt Ltd (CIPL), runs a business in varied household goods. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 8:15 am
As the panel put it, the challenge facing a district court considering class certification is how to: "(a) decide whether reliance can be proven by common evidence without (b) delving too far into the merits of the materiality or falsity of the representations at issue, while still (c) reserving loss causation entirely for the merits phase? [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:02 pm
Both companies are engaged in the manufacture and commercialisation of street furniture design. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:26 am
§ 1337(b)(2). [read post]
