Search for: "Davis v. Davis" Results 7261 - 7280 of 8,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again:… [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 3:13 am by INFORRM
On Friday 17 January 2025, there was a hearing of an application in the case of Ben-Yair & Yair v Peaford KB-2024-003964. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Social Media Law Bulletion notes that, in the case of Palomino v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 12:54 am by INFORRM
On 5 November 2024, the Court of Appeal heard the appeal in Salman Iqbal v Geo TV Limited. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
- Chancery Div rules in a trade secret case relating to technical information: Vestergaard Frandsen A/S and others v Bestnet Europe Ltd and others (IPKat) EWHC (Ch) finds actionable breach of confidence in case concerning stolen invoices: JN Dairies Ltd v Johal Dairies Ltd, Gurbir Singh (IPKat) Advertising Standards Authority condemns wrongful use of Volvo log by an unauthorised Volvo dealership (Class 46) Banksy – an unlikely copyright ambassador? [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm by Brandon Duke
Judge Davis dissented and disagreed with all three holdings. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am by INFORRM
  This week it has a post on Mr Hemming’s change of  mind on the ZAM v CFW case. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 22 and 23 July 2019 the same judge heard the trial in the case of Fentiman v Marsh. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]