Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 8:38 am
The only agency that does is the public defender’s office. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 7:27 pm
§ 2191(c)(1).) [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:06 pm
Ordinary regulation does not appear capable of deterring (or even detecting) dangerous activity here. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:05 pm
Ordinary regulation does not appear capable of deterring (or even detecting) dangerous activity here. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:38 pm
The Court noted that the penalty set forth in subdivision 20 is expressly described as a cumulative remedy, rendering it nonexclusive. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:22 pm
Any client with over £1000 in disposable capital to pay a one off £100 contribution, over monthly contributions, to be collected by the legal aid practice and set against payments by the LSC Over £3100, payment of £1 of capital for each £1 over, up to £8000. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:22 pm
Any client with over £1000 in disposable capital to pay a one off £100 contribution, over monthly contributions, to be collected by the legal aid practice and set against payments by the LSC Over £3100, payment of £1 of capital for each £1 over, up to £8000. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:17 pm
The appellant does not have a prima facie case in its favour in view of the above discussion. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 5:02 am
The short memorandum decision does not indicate why no answer was served within 20 days of the indefinite extension's termination. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm
Vilches-Navarrete, 523 F.3d 1, 13 (1st Cir. 2008) (“As we have said before, the Fourth Amendment does not apply to activities of the United States against aliens in international waters. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 4:31 am
In any event 10% on what is often a relatively modest damages award does not address the problem at 1 above; again, I have difficulty envisaging how this would be implemented in practice, means testing is simply too expensive to put into practice. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:16 pm
Does the experienced lawyer bill the client for an hour or for 1/10th of an hour? [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:49 am
Zimnaruk, 128 Conn. 124, 127, 20 A.2d 613 (1941). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:09 am
" She added: "Our system does not require as precondition of advocacy absolute trust in one's tribunal. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
Okay, that was sarcastic, but come on… how ridiculous does this crap have to get before someone says that’s enough? [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:09 pm
Cancer Research sued Barr for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on July 20, 2007. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
Stat. 20-2-114 (2009). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:08 am
The district forced him to defend charges concerning events that occurred more than 20 years ago, which left him unable to defend himself in violation of his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment; and 2. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:00 am
" Id. at 20.Judge Posner makes no bones about his belief that plaintiffs have engaged in litigation abuse. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:18 pm
Id. at *20. [read post]
