Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 12,272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
[Yikes: I thought courts had gotten away from the “violation of a terms of service can violate a hacking statute” mode of thinking.] __ This is a tough case to plod through. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:44 am
Appeal of Apple v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
District Court for the District of New Mexido 2000) (CIPA does not require a defendant to specify whether or not he will testify and the defendant maintains an option to remain silent regardless of CIPA disclosures). . . . [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 7:36 pm
Worse, he's helped set a precedent that will embolden future plaintiffs seeking to silence defendants through unconstitutional prior restraint. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:21 pm
So, unfamously, does defendant (doing business as Black Bear), and it called its dark roast blend “Charbucks Blend,” now “Mister Charbucks. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
The defendant was not required to go through prescriptions and identify off-label uses were found in the compendia by which the government judges eligibility for reinbursement. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:42 am
As I noted in a post in April, evidence showed that Mehanna coordinated his translations through known intermediaries for Al Qaeda. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
What does "material support" mean? [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
I recently obtained from the BPatG a preliminary ruling in which it determined that the patent failed to meet the technicity requirement of European patent law, where software as such is not patentable (didn't I just say that QE does well even without patent attorneys on board?). [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 1:39 pm
I does not make too much sense to me in a country that celebrates the burden of proof and the presumption of innocence. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 11:49 am
After yesterday’s argument in Rosemond v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:45 am
(When asked if he found Trojan viruses on the computer, the expert’s response was “`I said I didn't pay any attention to the viruses or Trojans, whether or not they were present. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
No trade dress this time.This first Apple v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Argument I. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I thought I’d pass along two briefs that the UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed in the last few weeks. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
First, the Supreme Court held in Oncale v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:16 am
I went through all of that to help keep our great nation safe, only to find that the same great nation I protected does not allow me to protect myself or my loved ones. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
--> As I noted in a post I did some years ago, many (most?) [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:37 pm
McZeal v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
Be In v. [read post]
