Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2012, 2:52 am
Apple’s arguments relied on a difference in meaning between the words 'hearing', 'action' and 'proceedings' in the English language version of the Regulation. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm
One recurrent issue before English courts is the whether EAWs issued at the earlier stages of inquisitorial proceedings are actually for the purposes of investigation or prosecution. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
UT(LC): procedure In LB Havering v Macdonald [2012] UKUT 154 (LC), the UT(LC) provided helpful confirmation that the approach on applications for permission to appeal for insufficient reasons adopted by the civil courts (see English v Emery, here), applies with equal force to the LVT . [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
UT(LC): procedure In LB Havering v Macdonald [2012] UKUT 154 (LC), the UT(LC) provided helpful confirmation that the approach on applications for permission to appeal for insufficient reasons adopted by the civil courts (see English v Emery, here), applies with equal force to the LVT . [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:08 pm
Finally, in the last article, Fabien Marchadier, who is a professor at Poitiers University, explores the consequences of the ECHR case Genovese v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:42 am
It has a middle class estimated to be over 30% of population which computes to 300,000 million people and also has the world's largest English speaking population. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
” In Yeager v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm
Proposed Classes to be discussed: 7B. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
., v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:55 am
., v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
National Council of Teachers in English etc. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
The Gupta case is U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Potts v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:40 am
Data retention not a breach of Article 8 Rosalind English has posted on the recent judgment in Catt v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 1471 (Admin) (30 May 2012). [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
There may be Bivens (Bivens v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
In Sulamérica Cia Nacional De Seguros S.A. v Enesa Engenharia S.A. [2012] EWCA Civ 638, the insurance contract in question concerned a project in Brazil, was governed by Brazilian law, and disputes arising out of or in connection with the policy were subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Brazilian courts. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:54 am
The best example of this approach is the decision in C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
“Bedford, like most English towns and cities, is full of CCTV cameras and no CCTV camera captured Bento going to or coming from the lake. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:45 am
In Sulamerica Cia Nacional de Seguros Sa v Enesa Engenharia SA [2012] EWCA Civ 638, the Court of Appeal found that the decision of Mr Justice Cooke (previously reported here) that an anti-suit injunction in favour of arbitration proceedings was valid would be upheld.At first instance, Cooke J held that the arbitration agreement in question was governed by English, not Brazilian law and that the arbitration clause prevailed over the exclusive jurisdiction clause which specified that… [read post]
