Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 7261 - 7280 of 30,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
  Affording retroactive application to new constitutional rules in state and federal postconviction proceedings promotes fairness to litigants and uniformity in the development of federal constitutional criminal doctrine. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:36 pm by Holland & Hart
On December 9, 2014, the Supreme Court unanimously held in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:46 pm
The way in which the Court decides this case will influence whether state postconviction courts believe they are required to provide a minimally fair process in order for their decisions to be steeled from federal review by the provisions of the AEDPA. 2. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am by Eric Goldman
Therefore, he fails to state a violation of the DMCA. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am by Robert M. Horwitz and Kyle M. Asher
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that a buyer of defaulted consumer debt was not subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am by Robert M. Horwitz and Kyle M. Asher
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that a buyer of defaulted consumer debt was not subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:43 am by Charlotte Bamford, Olswang LLP
 The Court cited Article 249 EC which states that ‘a decision shall be binding in its entirety upon those to whom it is addressed’ and the case of AssiDomän Kraft Products AB v Commission of the European Communities [1999] ECR I-5363 (Case C-310/97). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:53 pm
On April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 5:30 am by Kevin
As a reminder, the approximately four-foot-long Simon died in transit from England to the Iowa State Fair. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, the Court concluded that the authorities had failed to strike a fair balance between the right to freedom of expression and the need to protect public morals and the rights of others. [read post]