Search for: "FRAME v FRAME" Results 7261 - 7280 of 8,308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2015, 4:58 am
  Ironically, one of the cases cited for “these standards” was Carrera v. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 7:30 am by David Super
  We argue that if we just repeal the filibuster, or impeach Donald Trump (with no prospects of a conviction), or knock Donald Trump off the ballot over January 6, or convict him of felonies, or resuscitate the Voting Rights Act, or intimidate Senator Joe Manchin, or expand the Supreme Court, or hold an Article V convention, or something else, we will be fine. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As Franks’ book was going to press, the Supreme Court granted cert in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  We should crave a space of freedom v. enriched forms of community.Haggerty: Fear drives politics. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:29 pm
Conversely, as place fades from importance in a given domain of law, place-based views of the subject of those domains can remain a source of moral framing or legal answers to ambiguous issues. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Sobre os perigos da teoria em relação a realidade: Não vejo estes perigos, ao contrário eu acho que a teoria é um suporte necessário, entre outras funções, como registro dos vários processos de transformação que o homem tem vivido. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 However, I must say that the framing of the book struck me as odd. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 9:14 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court will say about civil marriage in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Joey Fishkin
 Judge Posner, who is out promoting his 40th book, reflected in the interview [see around 8:45-10:45] on his opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for a plurality in Hamdi v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am by Marty Lederman
Most of my previous posts here about Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood have been devoted to the question of whether the plaintiffs have adequately alleged that federal law imposes a "substantial burden" on their exercise of religion--the threshold question under RFRA. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 11:26 am by Eugene Volokh
This leads to a rare potential victory for someone who illegally came to the U.S. from Indonesia, and who is seeking to reopen his asylum case.From Sihotang v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
In their new work, Jim and Linda seek to show how liberalism, properly framed, can achieve this -- contrary to the critiques of communitarians on the one hand, and the desires of libertarians and minimalists on the other. [read post]