Search for: "Fields v. A S" Results 7261 - 7280 of 17,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2012, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
The judge’s decision relied mostly on Supreme Court precedent from Oliver v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Matthew Flinn
Liberty had 120 observers in the field that day, and concluded in its report that the technique of kettling was given too much focus and was too much relied upon by police. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
In Dillon v Cush; Dillon v Boland ([2010] NSWCA 165) the New South Wales Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the defendant on the basis that the judge’s analysis of qualified privilege and malice was flawed. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:57 am by Antitrust Today
District Court for the Northern District of California has ruled that that Digital Sun’s antitrust complaint in Digital Sun v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:10 am
The recent UK Supreme Court decision in Vestergaard Frandsen A/S et al v Bestnet Europe Ltd et al, [2013] UKSC 31 [noted by the IPKat here] suggests that a higher standard should apply to this question – that the academics can be found liable only if they had actual knowledge or so-called "blind eye knowledge" of misappropriation. [read post]
2 May 2007, 8:08 am
The decision of the Supreme Court in Watters v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 8:58 am by Joe Consumer
David Shein filed an affidavit in Alicea v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:02 am
In fields such as the law of treaties, the law of the sea, the law of the non-navigable uses of international watercourses, State responsibility and State succession, the two institutions have for many decades found inspiration in each other's work. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm by Ruth Levor
S. 170 (1984), in which a police trespass onto a suspect's "open field" was found not to constitute a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment: "[I]n determining whether expectations of privacy are legitimate. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
We promised you that we would be "mining the depths" of Third Circuit's opinion in Colacicco v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Things changed after the employee’s second field assignment, however: now the agency mandates medical assessments for all workers as a condition of being posted to Afghanistan on temporary assignments. [read post]