Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 7261 - 7280 of 16,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2012, 3:44 pm
I'm fine with whatever a properly called Convention decides is best to do.)What needs amending? [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am by Jani Ihalainen
Cox Communications was fined $99,830.29 per work, resulting in damages for a total of about $1 billion.It is shocking to see such high damages being awarded in this case, and that an ISP was not protected by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) safe harbor provision. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 8:04 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000Read More [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 9:55 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And so, on January 29, exactly two weeks later,   Baca v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 12:40 pm by Jeff Gamso
Supreme Court Mondy in Mullenix v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Ben
The bill reached the attention of lawmakers by way of a citizen’s initiative following a highly-publicised case in which anti-piracy authorities fined a 10-year old girl for illegally downloading pop music on to her home computer. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Employee’s argument that “mitigating circumstances” should temper imposing the penalty of dismissal from her position rejected Thornton v Edwards-Knox Cent. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 7:21 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
”(p. 13)Por último esboza una definición: “la CJPI puede ser esquematizada como un conjunto de actividades procesales (cuya proyección no se agota en las simples formas), regulares (normales), concretas y de diverso nivel, cumplidas por órganos jurisdiccionales competentes en materia penal, pertenecientes a distintos Estados soberanos, que convergen funcional y necesariamente a nivel internacional, en la realización de un mismo fin, que no es otro que… [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 12:46 pm by Larry
In this case, it comes from the Eleventh Circuit, with a special guest appearance from the Court of International Trade.The case is United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:03 pm
Well, deaf to both the voters’ will and to the SJC’s 2011 ruling on pot and warrantless searches, another police department pushed the envelope on this issue, and was soundly rejected: In Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
In doing so, the court was not judging the obviousness of the claimed invention by reference to later evidence: it was simply defining by evidence what it was that the invention was or brought with it [Says the IPKat, this is a fine difference but clearly a significant one. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 10:47 am by Emily Dai
And Robert Loeb and Cesar Lopez-Morales wrote about United States v. [read post]