Search for: "In Re Member of Bar" Results 7261 - 7280 of 9,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 11:50 pm by Mandelman
  BUT IF YOU DON’T WANT TO LEARN A WHOLE LOT ABOUT LOAN MODIFICATIONS, I’D SAY PROBABLY SKIP IT, OR SKIM IT FOR THE PARTS THAT YOU’RE INTERESTED IN LEARNING ABOUT. [read post]
3 May 2010, 8:58 am by Mazyar Hedayat
At first the strategy was to have bar associations pay for the service and pass it on as a member benefit, which worked out fine. [read post]
3 May 2010, 8:08 am by admin
Forum April 30, 2010) a single member Panel was faced with a dispute over the domain www.vrsim.com. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:49 am by B.W. Barnett
He also serves as a liaison to the defense bar when they have questions about the court and its processes. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:34 am by SOIssues
“But on the other hand, you’re stuck with what the law says. [read post]
1 May 2010, 9:01 pm
” Essentially all defendants found Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity are committed to the state psychiatric hospital (Bridgewater State Hospital,) where they spend decades if not their entire lives behind bars and barbed wire. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 10:52 am by lawmrh
The Arizona State Bar is asking its members for comments again. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:45 am by CAPTAIN
He was re-elected in 2004, again without opposition. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
If you are not a Section member, I would encourage you to join. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
(By the way, if you're not following the South Carolina Bar on Twitter, why aren't you?) [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:20 am by Michael
  Still, it makes a change from, 'a man walks into a bar'. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:21 pm by Matt Brown
Under considerable pressure from other members of the bar, I was convinced not to try publicly humiliating the lawyers who file them. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:08 pm by Jim Hodgson
  Indeed, unnecessarily going beyond even the two Supreme Court decisions (Central Bank in 1994 and Stoneridge in 2008) that the lower court noted were ripe for legislative re-examination, the panel granted complete immunity from lawsuits to all those who knowingly engage in securities fraud unless they are publicly identified or publicly participate in the wrongdoing,” explained Ira Schochet, Esq., NASCAT’s President. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:14 pm by CAPTAIN
He is a member of The Florida Bar for 35 years. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:40 am by Diane Levin
If you’re a member of the public that currently uses mediation services or may use such services one day, you should be worried, too. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
 Because Doe is the last case Justice Stevens is will hear argued, barring any unexpected additions to the Court’s calendar, Jesse Holland of the Associated Press reports on his activity during the argument. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm by azatty
We’re not talking about your case. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:51 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Under considerable pressure from other members of the bar, I was convinced not to try publicly humiliating the lawyers who file them. [read post]
First, there can be no serious doubt that the rules reflect an expectation that boards will re-examine and in many cases improve their corporate governance policies and practices. [read post]