Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 7261 - 7280 of 18,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2016, 4:41 am by Will Baude
Even though both of our pieces quite short, it’s hard to do them both justice in a couple of paragraphs, so if you’re intrigued, please read the whole thing. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:21 am by Peter Mahler
The Re/Max Case The dispute in Re/Max of New York, Inc. v Weber, Short Form Order, Index No. 600848/16 [Sup Ct Nassau County Nov. 29, 2016], centered on two, diametrically opposed narratives surrounding a 1998 transaction in which a stockholder with 15 shares representing a 4% equity stake sold his interest to the defendant, Weber, who served as president and director of the company in the business of franchising real estate brokers. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by MBettman
  They then re-filed their claims against Delaware Grace and Darrell Anderson in the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The only “public” debate seems to have been the Family Justice Council Annual Debate on 1st December. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by Andrew Hamm
In the role of chief justice, Alito seemed quite comfortable with his opening declaration, as if he might enjoy one day being the real one: “We will hear argument in the case of Lord and Lady Montague, Lord and Lady Capulet v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by Susan Hennessey, Benjamin Wittes
Tillerson has close ties with President Vladimir V. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 3:30 am by Cyra Choudhury
Using two cases, one from Canada that he refers to as “The Bountiful” (Reference re: Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Can., 2011 BCSC 1588), and Brown v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Ce test ne doit pas être à ce point sévère qu’il stérilise le droit d’appel ni à ce point souple qu’il place les deux parties à l’action collective pour ainsi dire sur le même pied en ce qui a trait au droit d’appel et devienne une entrave à l’accès à la justice que l’action collective se veut un moyen de faciliter. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 8:25 am by MBettman
In re Story, 159 Ohio St. 144, 111 N.E.2d 385 (1953) (the protection against discovery of matters identified as “privileged” in Civ.R. 26(B)(1) is limited to those derived from a specific constitutional or statutory provision) Amato v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am by INFORRM
In Re: W (A child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1140 the Court of Appeal considered a case in which a Family Court judgment was severely critical of two witnesses and the applicant local authority. [read post]