Search for: "J. A. C." Results 7261 - 7280 of 19,476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2016, 11:48 am
Publication is anticipated in 2016, and there's an interesting IP story behind it, says Darren.* We've got five years, that's all we've gotDavid reports of a brand-new reference to the CJEU (Case C-654/15) from the Swedish Supreme Court (case no. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:22 am by Brian Leiter
One of Boğaziçi's undergraduate philosophy students, Jülide Yazıcı, was arrested, along with 3 other students, and has apparently already... [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:00 am by Aaron Weems
  Montgomery County has had private attorneys working as discovery masters for some time with Wendy Rothstein from my office serving as a master, while in Berks County, J. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
All practice, no theory.Copyright Litigation Handbook (Thomson Reuters Westlaw 2014-2015) by Raymond J. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 8:23 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
“No puedo dejar de mencionar –y encomendar encarecidamente a mi sucesor o sucesora- algo que desde el principio ha estado muy presente en mi agenda presidencial: la educación de la comunidad –jóvenes y adultos-sobre sus derechos y sus deberes cívicos y cómo la Rama Judicial les sirve como instrumento para hacer valer esos derechos. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 5:38 pm
He wrote at paragraphs 98 and 99:[98]           The alternative approach, and the one which I adopt in this case, is to apply s 8 of the Judicature Act, RSA 2000 c J-2. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Appellate Court of Connecticut:  Bozelko v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The New Zealand court recognised a similar tort in C v Holland [2012] 3 NZLR 672. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
 Following Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [2001] 1 All ER 952, Carr J held that the Court has discretion to impose an injunction where it is necessary and appropriate in the circumstances. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
(c) If the jury is unable to agree unanimously on whether one or more aggravating circumstances have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the court shall dismiss the jury and impanel a new jury to retry the penalty phase. [read post]