Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 21,107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2018, 6:52 am
The court ultimately decided the case in defendant’s favor. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:51 pm
Defendant #1 is 10 percent liable, and defendant #2 is 90 percent liable. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:21 am
The court warned that if colleges fail to protect students, they can be held liable. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:54 am
The person sitting in the driver’s seat? [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:54 am
The person sitting in the driver’s seat? [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
In that case, the parties agreed that evidence obtained from the defendant was not to be provided to the third party without the defendant’s consent. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 12:34 pm
In other words, the defendant may be liable for damages resulting from the injury even if its subcontractor was negligent. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 12:18 pm
In addition, both truck drivers and trucking companies can be held liable for a driver’s negligent conduct. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:21 am
The court explained that, under that state’s law, dog owners are strictly liable for injuries caused by their animals. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:09 am
Defendants moved for summary judgment, which the district court granted, reasoning that defendants were not vicariously liable because they neither hired the publisher nor ratified its text messaging campaign. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:24 am
The jury determined that the dogs did belong to the defendant, but it did not find that the defendant knew of the plaintiff’s presence or was negligent in controlling the dogs. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:09 am
The elements of a cause of action for intentional interference with contractual relations are “(1) the existence of a valid contract between the plaintiff and a third party; (2) the defendant’s knowledge of that contract; (3) the defendant’s intentional acts designed to induce a breach or disruption of the contractual relationship; (4) actual breach or disruption of the contractual relationship; and (5) resulting damage. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:09 am
The elements of a cause of action for intentional interference with contractual relations are “(1) the existence of a valid contract between the plaintiff and a third party; (2) the defendant’s knowledge of that contract; (3) the defendant’s intentional acts designed to induce a breach or disruption of the contractual relationship; (4) actual breach or disruption of the contractual relationship; and (5) resulting damage. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:50 am
And, while plaintiff alleges that Aretz’s retainer agreement with her husband violated his ethical or expert duty to act as a neutral evaluator, that fact alone is insufficient to hold him liable. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
The trial court denied Yelp’s motion. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 8:10 pm
Sub-part (ii) provides that the insurer “shall not be liable to make any payment of loss in connection with … the prosecution, adjudication, settlement, disposition, resolution or defense of (a) Event(s); or (b) any Claim(s) arising from the Events(s). [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm
A case in which our firm defended a former Motorola executive was covered in Crain’s Chicago Business. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 11:39 am
To hold an owner personally liable – something called “piercing the corporate veil” – can be even more challenging. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 10:58 am
In order to bring a successful wrongful death suit, you should be able to show that: Your loved one died as a result of the employer’s negligence; You have suffered losses due to your loved one’s death; and If your loved one had lived, he or she could have recovered damages for pain and suffering from the defendant. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 10:26 am
In other words, you can hold them strictly liable for the injuries you suffered when using their product, which should have been safe to use. [read post]
