Search for: "People v Favors"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 11,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 10:02 am
(Note Justice Kagan with arms outstretched comparing courtroom to 35 ft buffer around clinics) (Art Lien) The three dissenters from the Court’s last major ruling in favor of abortion clinic buffer zones left no doubt in the hearing on McCullen v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:19 am
Moreover, although the Court held in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm
There was much talk of easements, and limited fees, servitudes, and reversionary interests, but in the end it was far from clear what would guide the Court to a ruling in Marvin Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:32 am
TFDP also recently settled a civil rights lawsuit that challenged practices that denied poor people the right to counsel in pretrial criminal proceedings in Williamson County, after receiving a favorable ruling from the Texas Supreme Court in Heckman v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:08 pm
In Brannen v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm
v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Sorrell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:15 am
Some people believe that originalism constrains judges. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:11 am
Klinger v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
Bond v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:20 pm
Bush v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:25 am
Case citation: Sen v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:03 pm
Joseph II. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
EEOC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
As held in People v Lewis, People v Ventimiglia, People v Santarelli and People v Allweiss, it is elementary that evidence of a defendant's prior criminal or immoral conduct is inadmissible if it cannot logically be linked to some specific material issue in the case. [read post]
