Search for: "People v. Case" Results 7261 - 7280 of 51,417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2017, 9:05 am
Her piece, The New 'Non-Summary Summary Denial,' focuses on People v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:42 am by SHG
After learning of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm by Ilya Somin
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
The officers were sending messages in their free time from their personal electronic devices, which most people would surely see as a prima facie “private” activity. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:29 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court says this is a legitimate excessive force case and that the police cannot at this point in the proceeding assert qualified immunity.The case is Edrei v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 1:11 am
In order to comply with subscription agreements you will need to use your own Westlaw password to view cases listed below: 1. People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
As Susan notes, the site includes a prediction on a key ERISA case, Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:54 am by Mark Keenan
The Supreme Court has ruled that the pre-nuptial agreeement signed in the case of Radmacher -V- Garantino is enforceable and that it agreed that in the right case such agreements can have decisive or compelling weight. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:14 am by Dawn McIntosh
To review the Court of Appeal opinion, click this link - Kern County Water Agency v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm by NARF
Participation of Indigenous Peoples in decision making over deep-seabed mining. [read post]
13 May 2021, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff sues the Otisville people for the constitutional (due process) violation of denying him the right to appear in person for his hearing; he claims the failure to comply with the state directive cause his excessive force case to be dismissed.The case is Dixon v. [read post]