Search for: "Price v. Price"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 18,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 6:12 pm
” In the first case, franchisees of Quizno’s Canada Restaurants Corp allege that they were charged exorbitant prices for mandatory product in breach of their franchise agreements and of anti-competition and price-fixing laws: 2038724 Ontario Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:48 am
British Telecommunications Plc v Telefonica o2 UK Limited & Ors (3 – 4 Feb 2014): The respondents, various mobile phone network operators, disputed the reasonableness of the appellant’s new pricing system of telephone termination charges. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:43 am
Cal. 2008) and Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:49 pm
See Price v Price, 69 N.Y.2d 8, 11 (1986). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
VeriSign Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 10:38 am
James Batson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:55 am
However, in Zhang v Amaral-Gurgel the Court took a firm stance on the use and abuse of such “lawyer approval” clauses. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:27 pm
… The presence and extent of injuries are to be determined on the basis of evidence given in court. [32] Second, in Price v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:46 am
” Nine offerors submitted proposals, including Ma-Chis Kawv V, LLC. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:53 am
" "Here, contrary to the assertion of the law firm, it failed to meet its burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Greene v Sager, 78 AD3d 777; Eisenberger v Septimus, 44 AD3d 994). [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:57 am
Supreme Court’s rationale in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:12 pm
” In the first case, franchisees of Quizno’s Canada Restaurants Corp allege that they were charged exorbitant prices for mandatory product in breach of their franchise agreements and of anti-competition and price-fixing laws: 2038724 Ontario Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:07 am
In O’Leary v. [read post]
Seventh Circuit Approves Both “Untimely” Interlocutory Appeal and Issue-Specific Class Certification
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
George McReynolds, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:59 pm
Uline, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 7:55 pm
Mgmt., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:38 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 10:43 pm
In Society of Lloyd’s v Price in re : Society of Lloyd’s v Lee 2006 5 SA 393 (SCA) the South African Supreme Court of Appeal dealt with the gap problem which arose in considering whether the English or South African law of prescription applied and followed the approach in Lourens v van Hohne 1993 2 SA 104 (UW). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm
There were many reports of these statements, including Press Gazette, the Guardian and Tabloid Watch. 2.12.11 TLJ/10/0482 (sic) Andre v Price. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
See Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
