Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 27,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
Stephens v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 9:22 am
See Sunoco, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:35 am
Brown v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Francoeur, on the brief), Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York, N.Y., for Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc.Before: LEVAL, STRAUB and DRONEY, Circuit Judges.STRAUB, Circuit Judge:This putative class action alleges violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA") and New York's usury law. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:28 am
Juror Rehabilitation Case The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado issued an opinion in Marko v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:57 am
., United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:50 am
Torres v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:49 am
A recent case that alleged harm under the Federal Tort Claims Act, DUCKWALL-KENNADY v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 6:12 am
” Hwang v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:38 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Similarly, in IPCom the true test was deemed to be “abuse of process – procedural fairness”. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Click for the court's opinion: Ruiz v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 9:04 pm
This is the train of citations (Sidhom is not pertinent): Thomas (2002): The defendant, however, bears the ultimate burden of proving, by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that the evidence should not be used against him (see, People v Berrios, supra at 367; People v Baldwin, 25 NY2d 66, 70; People v Whitehurst, 25 NY2d 389, 391; Nardone v United States, 308 US 338, 341-342), and that the police lacked probable cause to arrest him (see, People… [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:06 am
Ct. 280; United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:30 pm
CareerFairs.com v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:02 am
This suggests that in such situations the State may attempt to have the case dismissed on the grounds that it immune from suit in federal court for alleged violations of Title VII in view of the rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kimel v Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 and Alden v Maine, 527 U.S. 706, cases involving employees suing their state employer in federal court for alleged violations of, respectively, the Age Discrimination in… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:34 am
Maxon v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:41 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Hosanna-Tabor Church v. [read post]
