Search for: "State v. Howes" Results 7261 - 7280 of 72,772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Schrader examines the literature surrounding the “carceral state” and spotlights how the turn toward transnationalism or “the US in the world” has been notably absent. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:42 am by Gaëtan Gerville-Réache
On July 15, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion in Kyser v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 7:42 am by Paul Horwitz
My friend Christopher Lund has a fine piece on Slate (how rare it is that I get to string those words together!) [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:05 am by Tom Smith
Wade is a woman’s right to choose whether to have an abortion, but Roe allows the state to restrict abortion at some point in pregnancy, then there is no particular reason to treat viability as the cutoff.According to Roberts’s implicit theory, the justices could vote to uphold the Mississippi law while simultaneously saying that they were not overturning Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 4:19 pm by Abhinav Chandrachud
The US Supreme Court's latest opinion in the case of McDonald v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) [Germany][Petition granted] [Habitual residence]   In Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) Asli Baz, a citizen of Germany, filed suit seeking to compel Anthony Patterson, a citizen of the United States, to return their six-year-old son, A.P., from Illinois to Germany. [read post]
After describing how the Due Process Clause and Commerce Clause inquiries “largely overlap,” the majority devoted much of its analysis to the “fair apportionment” prong under Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Judgment Warby J cited the relevant principles on meaning from paras 11 to 12 of Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB). [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 9:26 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of KansasOpinion Date: 9/17/09Cite: Oldham Graphic Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
United States, when it held: "When a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds.'" In United States v. [read post]