Search for: "U.S. v. Washington" Results 7261 - 7280 of 11,819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Supreme Court in 1869, ruled that Texas did NOT have a right to secede, in the case, Texas v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
 It's difficult to quantify the costs that such closed rules impose on businesses and workers, but a recent examination of US job creation demonstrates that they could be significant (h/t Mark Perry): Since the recession ended in June 2009, almost three out of every four jobs added to U.S. payrolls have been in Right to Work states (1.86 million out of 2.59 million), even though those 22 states represent only 38.8% of the U.S. population (120 million). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 7:44 am
Jul 9, 2012 BYU Law student, Greg Israelsen gains valuable experience in Washington, D.C., including attending the opinion reading of the Arizona v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 4:59 pm by Mary Whisner
(I've been reading it for a few weeks and have just gotten to the part about his role in Muller v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 6:35 pm by David Balto
Google• Leave a comment on What Consumers Want in FTC v. [read post]