Search for: "US v. Banks" Results 7261 - 7280 of 13,987
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Something for the tenants Nearly Legal gave us some useful information backing up the Superstrike v Rodriguez case from last year. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United… [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:23 am by Stewart Baker
New York State issues a short report on bank cybersecurity practices and promises to start asking banks about these practices in inspections. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:59 pm by Kevin
Looks like we have a new record for Largest Known Demand: Anton Purisma v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:30 pm by Dennis Crouch
After all, she was one of the Federal Circuit judges who would have upheld all of the patent claims for computer-implemented inventions in the CLS Bank v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:08 am by Allison Tussey
Laura Ortuondo, 33, formerly of San Diego, California, pleaded guilty before Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:55 am
  As Wikipedia explains, the Model Penal Code was meant to standardize the definitions of crimes used in the U.S. states. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there were statements in open court in the cases of Pullen v FTI Consulting LLP [pdf] and Banks v Belchim Crop Protection Ltd [pdf]. [read post]
10 May 2014, 12:23 am by Florian Mueller
Nevertheless, one effort after the other (recently, CLS Bank) is made to persuade judges to legislate from the bench. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
Sundquist, 13-852, a case involving the power of a state to restrict an out-of-state national bank’s exercise of its fiduciary powers in that state. [read post]